43°Partly Cloudy

Reston Real Estate: Do Absentee Owners Impact Your Cluster?

by RestonNow.com Sponsor May 8, 2018 at 4:30 pm 5 Comments

This is a sponsored post from Eve Thompson of Reston Real Estate. For a more complete picture of home sales in your neighborhood, contact her on Reston Real Estate.

I had a great real estate question this week. A friend who lives in a Lake Anne neighborhood wrote to say that the number of rentals had increased in her cluster; she was worried about the impact of that on the community and property values. She wanted to know “…what, if anything, could be done about it.”  A quick search of her cluster and determined that in her cluster were 27.5% absentee owners.

27.5% investor ownership is probably something that would be noticed in a smaller neighborhood. You might see more a little more transience with people coming and going and it can, not always, leave things looking a little less kept-up.

In condominiums lenders look at investor ownership levels as a part of assessing risk of lending in a particular condominium. If a condominium gets above 35% investor ownership some banks start looking for higher down payments from buyers and if a condominium gets to 50% investor ownership many banks will pass on lending all together.

So what can a townhouse cluster do to minimize the impact of higher investor ratios? Here are the recommendations I made to my friend who originally posed the question.

Push for strong covenants enforcement because this is where real damage can be done to a neighborhood with high investor ratios. Absentee owners can have an out of sight out of mind attitude about maintenance and tenants are rarely responsible for more than basic yard care.

Work with your cluster board to be tough about exterior repairs and maintenance. Form a group that looks for issues, don’t let absentee owners slide on violations. They are profiting from the rental of property and should shoulder their share of the burden of maintenance to keep the neighborhood as whole looking good.

This can be a great opportunity to keep a helpful eye on older owners who may not be as able to do some of heavy lifting required for exterior maintenance. Having a group of “helpers” that pitch in where needed will keep the neighborhood looking good and provide an excuse to check in on neighbors that might need a little assistance.

And finally, remember that tenants are also your neighbors — they don’t have full control of the property they occupy, but the more engaged everyone is in the well-being of the community the better.

  • RoadApples

    Well said/written. Congrats

  • Greg

    What’s the status of the county’s airbnb ordinance? There are more than a few transient rental units in Reston. It appears there are more than 300:


    • Eve Thompson

      I haven’t stayed current with this issue. Though I think its an interesting problem. I think there are some areas where an airbnb would be fine but I think there are some instances where it can negatively impact the character of the neighborhood.

  • Lauren Graham

    As a renter with an absentee landlord, I *wish* my place was more kept up than it was! I’m not sure transience is to blame so much as landlords looking for an easy buck.

    • Eve Thompson

      I agree Lauren- that’s why I think it’s so important for the Cluster Boards to be firm about maintenance issues. It’s not fair for an absentee owner to profit off of the location while not shouldering any of the burden of keeping the neighborhood up.


Subscribe to our mailing list