Reston Association Board Gives OK To Consider Payoff of Lake House Loan in 2018 Budget

by Dave Emke September 18, 2017 at 4:00 pm 13 Comments

During a special Monday afternoon session (video), the Reston Association Board of Directors voted to guide staff toward using operating reserves to pay off the remaining $2.4 million on the Lake House loan as the 2018 budget is compiled.

Sridhar Ganesan, treasurer and At-Large member, shared information with directors about what he says is a “low-risk” option that would benefit members. CEO Cate Fulkerson said staff “strongly desires” the loan be paid off this year using the reserves.

“These are things we should consider as a Board, but my own perspective is [that] if we cannot put the money to work in other areas, [then] this is like returning money back to the shareholders,” Ganesan said.

Ganesan said RA’s operating reserves have never fallen below $4 million, and that they peak at around $12 million each year as assessments are collected. Given this information, he said, there is little concern associated with funds being taken from the account and used to pay off the loan now.

Ganesan had earlier shared this information with members during a community budget workshop last week. Taking care of the loan would reduce the assessment rate by $8.66 in 2018.

Director Julie Bitzer (South Lakes District) asked whether Ganesan and staff had considered making the payoff in multiple stages instead of all at once, if the Board is “nervous” about taking so much from reserves. Ganesan said he believes there is no reason to be uncomfortable about taking the money from reserves in one lump sum.

“You have enough cashflow coming in [from assessments] in order to meet the expenses in case there is [any] problem,” he said. “[Even if] on March 1, only 50 percent of members have paid their assessments — that’s a real problem, that’s a crisis. But even then, we have collected 50 percent of assessments; that’s $7.5 million.”

In addition, directors discussed rentals and programming at the Lake House with Laura Kowalski and Mike Leone, RA’s deputy director of recreation and communications director, respectively. In Ganesan’s budget projections, he says that possible expansion of operating hours and increasing the ratio of rentals to programming at the facility would increase profitability.

Afterschool programming at the Lake House, which begins at 2:30 p.m. each day, can hinder the opportunity to rent the property out for daylong corporate retreats, Leone said.

“Most businesses, if they want to do a retreat offsite, typically are looking at wanting to come in at around 8 o’clock in the morning … and then they want to go until, at a minimum, 4 or 5 o’clock in the afternoon,” he said. “They really don’t have that [opportunity] today because, realistically, if you’re doing a corporate meeting there you have to be out at the latest … at about 1:30.”

Nineteen families participate in afterschool programming at the Lake House, Kowalski said. Over 100 kids participate in summer camp there.

The Board guided staff, as it compiles its 2018 budget projections, to consider ending afterschool and other programming at the Lake House while maintaining a summer camp there. This would allow for evening rentals in the summer and all-day rentals the rest of the year.

The Board also voted to guide staff to move forward with considering expansion of rental hours at the Lake House to 8 a.m. to 11 p.m. on Saturdays and Sundays, which would put it in line with RA’s other rentable properties. Renters would need to comply with the Fairfax County Noise Ordinance.

Director John Mooney (North Point District) said he was concerned about being fair to those who are already under contract for afterschool programming. He suggested contacting them immediately to let them in on the discussion.

No official decisions have yet been made on the budget or about 2018 Lake House operations.

Board guidance on the second draft of the 2018 budget must be completed at their Sept. 28 meeting. Another community budget session is slated for Sunday, Oct. 15, followed by public hearings on Oct. 26 and Oct. 30. The budget is to be approved during the Board’s Nov. 16 meeting.

  • Drip

    Is this where Cate goes to mail the check but gets stopped along the way by a nice man living along a lakeshore selling a magic shed that may be dilapidated but has ergonomically friendly desks and must be rendered free from otter development for only three times its value, so she, Bitzer, and Sanio decide they better get on it but should negotiate, and finally they agree on purchasing the shed but for only five times its value?

  • Donald

    Well, hey now. Looks like Irwin and a handful of directors made a big decision on our behalf this afternoon.


    • Bill

      That’s what they volunteered to do

  • Conservative Senior

    We should not be running a day care. Sell all the buses we purchased. Bet the insurance cost would go down.
    I don’t care what Cate thinks, she was a driving force for this mess. Did she give up her bonus as she said she would?

    • Donald

      What a horrible idea. But, I’m sure this board will agree with you.


    • Greg

      Yes, yes, yes. There are how many buses? For 19 participants? #smfh.

  • Donald


    When reviewing the latest reserve study we appear to have significant funding issues in about 16-18 years. See slide 16. Prior boards have attempted to revise our funding to the RRRF to alleviate this issue.

    At this time, do we believe we have a handle on things at current levels. Because alternative 3 on slide 17 is a very big number for a remedy — $20,000,000 for a special assessment.

    Mr. Higgins — thoughts??



    • John Higgins

      This 2010 Report (there has been a more recent one) helped motivate the board to change how the RRRF is funded. It took couple of years to turn that motivation into action, but the funding method changed. Annual funding has almost doubled since then. The process still needs some work (there are assets and costs not included in the reserve study) but everything I hear tells me RA is on the right track to avoid major funding spikes or special assessments.

      • Donald

        Good to know. I’d hate to see this or future boards not realize the importance of the RRRF and it’s funding.


        • Keeping the RRRF healthy and well-funded is probably the most critical piece of work on our plate over the long term. John is right that there are assets not currently included in the reserve study, and we are working to identify them ahead of the upcoming 2019 study. We are also scrubbing the expected lifespans of our existing capital assets so that we can incorporate a more accurate picture of what needs to be replaced and when.

          Our contributions to the RRRF are based on the previous reserve study. Once the 2019 study is complete, we will be able to adjust our contributions accordingly. Speaking for myself, I have no intention of messing up the RRRF.

  • 40yearsinreston

    Raze the white elephant shed and turn it into a dog park
    This is the only way the initial investment can be recouped

  • Good bye Kate

    Can we get five more elephants like Sridhar pls?

  • RestonAssurance

    Will there be paid parking at the Lake House to subsidize the payoff?


Subscribe to our mailing list