35°Partly Cloudy

Barking Dogs, Big Parties Could Be Trouble Under Proposed County Noise Rules

by Karen Goff May 6, 2014 at 10:00 am 4 Comments

Sign at dog park at Baron CameronYour barking dog may earn you a misdemeanor fine if a proposed noise amendment moves forward in Fairfax County.

The county will hold a series of public hearings this month to get community feedback on changes its noise ordinance.  The county zoning department says the goal of the proposed noise ordinance is to “minimize nighttime noise and guarantee residents a certain level of quietness within their homes.”

The proposed new noise ordinance would replace both the existing Noise Ordinance (Chapter 108), which went into effect in December, and the existing Excessive Sound Generation in Residential Areas and Dwellings provisions (Article 6 of Chapter 5 of the County Code).

This may be good news to five homeowners on Longwoood Grove in Reston. The group recently filed an injunction against Reston Dogs and the Fairfax County Park Authority about excessive noise at the off-leash dog area at Baron Cameron Park.

Under the proposed new noise ordinance, “noise from animals that is plainly audible and discernible for more than 10 consecutive or nonconsecutive minutes in any 30 minute period (1)  across property lines, (2) across residential unit partitions, or (3) a distance of 50 feet or more from the noise” may be a ticketable offense, if approved.

However, dog parks are considered “recreational grounds,” so barking dogs in a dog park would be permissible from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m., a county spokesman says.

The new noise ordinance also has guidelines for trash collection, motor vehicle noise, band practice, construction equipment and lawn mowers, among other situations. See the full list of amendments. Misdemeanor fines are $500 for a first offense.

The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors unanimously approved a new nuisance ordinance in late 2013.

But the most recent ordinance deals mainly with loud parties. The proposed amendments break down noise by individual situations.

Regarding big, raucous parties, the county is also seeking feedback on adding language to its zoning ordinance concerning large group gatherings. The county would like to limit group assembly in a home to 49 people at a time, and limit large group gatherings to fewer than three times in a 40-day period.

From Fairfax County:

Over the last several years, there have been complaints from residents regarding frequent and large gatherings at neighborhood homes. These gatherings can create parking, noise, and other concerns for the neighborhood. Although occasional, large gatherings – such as private parties, house concerts, religious meetings and social clubs – are expected and permissible activities at a home, gatherings that occur on a regular basis involving numerous people can detract from the residential nature of a neighborhood because most residential structures and neighborhoods are not designed to accommodate such events.

Accordingly, it is recommended that language be added to the Zoning Ordinance to define what is a permissible “group assembly,” and when associated with a residence, when such a group assembly is an appropriate “accessory use.” Currently, the Zoning Ordinance does not identify guidelines for the frequency or scale at which group assembly is considered to be a permitted accessory use to a dwelling. Without such specificity, managing and addressing impacts of these large, frequent gatherings becomes problematic, and the County is limited in its ability to respond to neighborhood concerns.

After the public comment period and changes to the amendments, the plans would have to be voted upon by the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors.

Have an opinion? Community meetings will be held from 7 to 9 p.m. at the following locations:

The county is also accepting public comments online.

Photo: Sign at Baron Cameron Dog Park/File Photo

  • RobinTrish

    Proposed Paragraph 31 does occasionally allow groups over 49 people : “Group assembly when accessory to a dwelling unit shall be permitted, except any group assembly exceeding forty-nine (49) people in one day shall not occur more frequently than three (3) times in any forty (40) day period”

  • Dave

    What a ridiculous proposal. I can have groups of 49 but that 50th person is “over the top”. Every 41 days is OK but 40 is too much. Do children count? How are the police going to enforce, will the residents need to hand out numbered tickets to all their party guests or maintain a guest list so that when the cops come knocking we can show them we are in compliance? Will this be 49 total for the day or at any one time? Don’t our local representatives have something better to do (like implement a meals tax or raise my property taxes)? So what is our Hunter Mill representatives perspective on this, all I hear are crickets (Oh no, maybe they are too loud)? BTW – my neighbor has bullfrogs in his yard and those darn pesky critters go on for hours. Will he get a ticket?

    • RobinTrish

      The proposal is that you can have 3 parties every 40 days with 50 or more people.

  • wireknob

    I do not see how this has any bearing on the dog park, which is a designated recreational area and not subject to the same restrictions as private residences. If noise from recreational areas fell under this restriction they would have to close down just about every park, pool and other recreational area in the county.


Subscribe to our mailing list