33°Clear

At First Election Forum, Reston Association Candidates Call for Stricter Financial Controls

by Fatimah Waseem February 27, 2018 at 1:00 pm 16 Comments

Candidates for an at-large seat on Reston Association’s Board of Directors called for tighter fiscal controls and better community engagement at a forum Monday night.

All seven candidates running for the three-year position struck similar positions on financial stewardship and balancing current facilities and programs with future programs as Reston’s braces for major population growth.

Calling himself “Reston’s advocate,” Derrick Watkins, an aircraft mechanic who moved to Reston four years ago, said RA must facilitate transparent discussions and invest more time in community engagement.

Sridhar Ganesan, former president of the Reston Citizens Association, drew from his experience as a current treasurer and director on the board, touting accomplishments like lowering assessments this fiscal year and leading the establishment of internal controls.

He hopes to reduce legal costs and employee costs while engaging in an “honest discussion” of services and programs the community desires. “I want to finish what I started eight months ago,” he said.

In contrast, Ven Iyer, president of a small technology business who took a hardline stance at the forum, said the board was operating in a “dogmatic mode” and needed to eliminate wasteful spending.

He said he wants to be the “voice to the families of Reston” by stopping wasteful spending, unwanted increases in assessment bills and invasive development projects. Among other examples, he criticized RA for decisions like a $100,000 website redesign that he said provided a “terrible user experience.”

Aaron Webb, who previously served as president of the Lakeside Cluster board and often cited his commitment to Reston’s core principles, said he wants to find ways to ensure development and amenities are available at the same pace. “Let’s not get the people here first and then get the venue,” he said.

Similarly, Travis Johnson, who touted nearly 20 years of experience in the public and private sector, said RA cannot “make investments randomly. “Every project that the board approves should have a clear middle and end,” he said.

Part of the challenge is staving off the “external greed of developers,” said John Pinkman, who has lived in Reston for 40 years and co-founded Rescue Reston, a grassroots organization. He hopes to protect and enhance property values, with the ultimate aim of uniting the “Reston spirit.”

“The bottom line really for me is that I really appreciate the $10 that we saved in our assessment, but I’m not sure i’m ready to sacrifice my home value to save that $10 a year,” he said.

Colin Meade, a sales executive who frequently reiterated his commitment to children’s programming and families, said RA must find ways to collect non-assessment dues. “I’m running for me and my family,” he said.

Diversity and Inclusion

The all-male panel stressed the need to engage with people from diverse backgrounds and aggressively recruit more women to run for RA.

Watkins said RA can encourage inclusivity by becoming “more relevant in people’s lives,” noting there are “no institutional hurdles” to run for election.

“We just need to get people interested in it,” Watkins said.

Iyer, one of three non-white candidates on the panel, said encouraging more grassroots candidates like himself to run will encourage minorities to run. If candidates run on slates and are openly supported by the current board — which is the case with four candidates — people may believe there is a “revolving door of candidates.”

Johnson and Ganesan are running alongside Tammi Petrine and John Bowman, who are seeking other board seats. Candidates on the slate said they chose to run together because of their shared ideas, including concerns about the Tetra purchase. They also oppose a controversial proposal to increase Reston’s population density.

In contrast, Iyer said the board was operating in “group think mode.” In the past year, the board failed to pass one motion and more than 120 decisions were passed unanimously, he said.

The Tetra Purchase

Candidates also focused on RA’s $2.65 million purchase of the Tetra property and cost overruns linked to the building’s renovation.

When asked if it was time to move forward after the controversial purchase 2015, Ganesan and Iyer said changes were not implemented thoroughly enough to give closure, including a third party review of the purchase by StoneTurn.

Others like Johnson and Meade, however, said it was time to move on.

“We can’t complaining about what happened before… we own it,” Johnson said, adding the purchase was “emblematic of mismanagement of RA.”

Boosting RA’s Influence

Candidates also touted the need to increase the influence of the board on the Hunter Mill District Supervisor, the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors and the county’s park authority. RA’s board and the county have clashed in recent years.

Pinkman said raising RA’s voice is especially if residential development encroaches upon Hidden Creek Country Gold Club.

The real power to enact change, Webb said lies at “the ballot box.”

With effective grassroots mobilization, Ganesan said it is possible to successfully challenge county positions, noting previous successes stopping development at Reston National Golf Course and the St. Johns Wood development.

Tonight, candidates running for an at-large seat for a one-year term and the South Lakes District seat will square off a second forum. The event will be streamed live on YouTube here and here

  • Umust B Kidding

    Yawn! Don’t see any specific proposals in all of this article. Just more yap, yap, yap….

  • Donald

    I was not overly impressed by any of the candidates on display last evening.

    Donald

    • Freedom of expression

      My aunt likes cheese.

      • Guest rather posting as such

        Kudos! This is the mostest awsomenessest commeny i have seen here since the beginning.

  • brawny

    I watched the forum online and this article looks like it was hastily put together. It does not do a fair job of characterizing what the candidates said. Better to watch the real thing at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EPBVLDTQLU

    • Greg

      It certainly wasn’t edited:

      “When asked if it was time to move forward after the controversial purchase 2015, Ganesan and Iyer said changes were not implemented thoroughly enough to give closure, including a third party review of the purchase by StoneTurn.

      “All seven candidates running for the three-year position struck similar positions on financial stewardship and balancing current facilities and programs with future programs as Reston’s braces for major population growth.”

  • John Higgins

    Tonight’s forum is at 7 pm.

  • Guest

    Too many “generalizations” and not enough “specifics”. Very disappointing considering the many issues that Reston is facing. Most disturbing to me was the notion that some of these candidates appear to want to modify or control our behaviors as residents and consumers of RA services, and as commuters using our vehicles (a real anti-auto crowd ).Nuts to them. Public transit as represented by Metro’s puny two-rail system or the infrequent (and usually almost empty) buses that circulate around here,is wasteful and inefficient and cannot possibly serve all the needs of a diverse population. So keep your “behavior control” proposals to yourself, that way lies only fascism.

  • 40yearsinreston

    Financial controls arent the problem
    No one is suggesting accounting fraud

    Governance is the issue

    • John Higgins

      Your first two statements are correct, and governance is certainly a big part of the issue. In an effort to make a quick fix, RA addressed certain “controls”. What is needed is an understanding of “internal controls” that every organization must have in place. An adequate internal control system is not a series of accounting steps. It is a system that reduces risks, attempts to avoid impropriety, enhances efficiency, and assures the organization’s effectiveness. Such a system has a number of gates that control almost every process to assure that policies are adequate and are being followed. Adding more policies or tinkering with existing ones might be needed at times, but how does the governing body know they are being followed and they are working? The answer is that the internal control systems provides assurance. As we saw with Lake House, there were policies in place. When they were not followed, no one knew because the internal control system was virtually useless. Having declared success and turned to other matters, the board is not likely to “get it” until they are shocked by the first internal control audit report.

  • 40yearsinreston

    My vote goes to the person who will stand up to Hudgens

  • Bernie Supporter

    This forum left me stumped for my second choice. For me, Ven Ivyer was the clear winner with a clear understanding of the issues, and the money issues. Can’t vote for Sridhar Ganenson for two reasons: 1) his misrepresentation of how he lowered our assessment fees by $10 when he had so little to do about it. And 2) His -4-for-Reston alliance just sickens me. This guy was appointed to the board — never won a single vote — and now with board members supporting him, he’s trying to lock in a majority from day one. Also can’t vote for Travis Johnson. That’s unfortunate because there’s nothing wrong with him. But his decision to run as a “slate” shows bad judgement and someone seeking an unfair advantage. I’ve had enough of that from the last board.
    Can’t vote for Derrick Watkins, either. Seems like a heck of a nice guy but doesn’t seem knowledgeable enough for the Board. I need to know more about Webb, Pinkman and Meade before I can vote for them.

×

Subscribe to our mailing list